E two meters you for recent decades, and why не и столетие е имало българско правителство или управляващо мнозинство, което е вложило толкова неистови усилия в своето религиозно декориране и опити ascension to the scale of religious ritual and ceremony. Distribution of particles from the cross of Christ , opening promotion , Exchange and drift of relics , in country and abroad , incl. photo campaign through relics to attract Russian tourists . Further - религиозно-обвързани рекламни клипове за евроизбори , посещения и финансиране на манастирски комплекси и манастирско строителство също documented facts similar situation exists in parliament, where from the outset, 41 th National Assembly has among other things official synodal Representative , even without specific legally established.
only, koeto Kato leaves may be the last pearl crown on Tues pravitelstvoto along religious policies is ustroyavane of own church ministry church .
thus could directly upcoming council in 2012 to be held directly in the building of the Council of Ministers , as has been done thousands of years ago to found and ecumenical councils in imperial palaces of Byzantium. And why not council itself should not be called by the Council of Ministers and Ministers to assist the work of the church council in 2012?
In one decisions the Holy Synod of the BOC of 9th November 2010 reads as follows:
only, koeto Kato leaves may be the last pearl crown on Tues pravitelstvoto along religious policies is ustroyavane of own church ministry church .
thus could directly upcoming council in 2012 to be held directly in the building of the Council of Ministers , as has been done thousands of years ago to found and ecumenical councils in imperial palaces of Byzantium. And why not council itself should not be called by the Council of Ministers and Ministers to assist the work of the church council in 2012?
---------- «»----------
+ + +
Having examined the letter of St. Sofia bishopric with attached letter to the Prime Minister of Bulgaria Mr. Boyko Borisov with request to build an Orthodox chapel in honor of St. John of Rila in close proximity to Granite Hall of the Council of Ministers ,
Holy Synod DECIDED:
Gives Blessing to build a chapel of St. John of Rila in the building of the Council of Ministers .
Sofia св. митрополия да бъде консултант по въпросите, свързани с изграждането и установяването на параклиса.
+++
В ъпросите, that arise around this synodal decision are many. Too much can be answered in one or two hundred words . example, whether it is just so simple, only with the synodal decision all in the construction of a chapel within the Council of Ministers? What other issues arise under canon law? And what is the legal (In a purely state-law terms) side of the question?
now directing the reader's attention only to the following provisions of the Charter of BOC: Art. 95, p. 8 UBPTS-BP in connection with art. 140, p. 8 UBPTS-BP ; and also to the provisions of the Constitution : Art. 13, para. 2 and 4 K ; and the Law on Religious - art. 4, Art. 7, para. 2 and especially art. 12 of Law Religious . But there are so many church canons and tenets of state case law , incl. and Decision The Constitutional Court № 2 / 1998 item 16, letter e , sentence. 1st ), which problematize largely hramostroitelstvo synodal decisions already in the building Council of Ministers that their discharge would need very, very ink. At this place we are merely summarize the following conclusion:
Synod of the BOC can not, and may not wish to decide the question by the Prime Minister otherwise. Synod has the above decision and has even expressed an opinion, the promotion of IV-th Church-People's Assembly of 1997 that "BOC to be official church under the Constitution of the Republic of Bulgaria" (Resh. 13 sentence. 4.). This samorazbirat Archpriests the BOC - canonical (in the sense of right) heads of state office - eg. state church.
For management of BOC obviously irrelevant or Basic Law nor any other legislation of the state. Implementation of the church constitution will not importance. Because the church hierarchy - as mere "church tradition" is simply no rule of law as a phenomenon, and there is an absolute monarchy Institute the head of which stood the time "God" vicar on earth, usually, as we know from history themselves in most cases full scoffer. Charters at the medieval time is almost gone. True faith is primarily hierarchical, dressed later in the robe of the Fathers canons to remain nevidoizmenena today. So that everything outside the robe of the hierarchical church authority to be given to eretizam and be prosecuted by the state.
It is clear that after the last ecumenical council kanonotvorcheski Fathers took place about 14 centuries, will be something different from what was then and that observe today.
Regardless of time and space, which is today the institution Synod of the BOC, she sees things only from one angle - symphonic - in time from the sixth century in Byzantium space . If you accidentally do, as recently around the Orthodox world entirely no monarch - Synod institution will see in the face of this or that manager monarch, who is required to withstand financial bishop's hierarchy and perform църковни задачи. Проблемът на днешното време е, че държавата, тази съвременната просто не е онази, която е изпълнявала църковни задачи. И няма как да стане управникът да финансира църковни йерархии, без това да не бъде санкционирано от данъкоплатеца - т.е. от вярващия, който иска данъците му да отиват там, където е и неговото trust. As recently shown, it is not sufficient in the management of BOC.
why synodal decision hramostroitelstvo in MS is nothing surprising, just once a clear example of the problems today of dogmatiziraneto of canons, following the canonization of dogmatics. And of course their failure. For the head of the Church - the Lord Jesus Christ came not to build temples on ministerial advice ...
For management of BOC obviously irrelevant or Basic Law nor any other legislation of the state. Implementation of the church constitution will not importance. Because the church hierarchy - as mere "church tradition" is simply no rule of law as a phenomenon, and there is an absolute monarchy Institute the head of which stood the time "God" vicar on earth, usually, as we know from history themselves in most cases full scoffer. Charters at the medieval time is almost gone. True faith is primarily hierarchical, dressed later in the robe of the Fathers canons to remain nevidoizmenena today. So that everything outside the robe of the hierarchical church authority to be given to eretizam and be prosecuted by the state.
It is clear that after the last ecumenical council kanonotvorcheski Fathers took place about 14 centuries, will be something different from what was then and that observe today.
Regardless of time and space, which is today the institution Synod of the BOC, she sees things only from one angle - symphonic - in time from the sixth century in Byzantium space . If you accidentally do, as recently around the Orthodox world entirely no monarch - Synod institution will see in the face of this or that manager monarch, who is required to withstand financial bishop's hierarchy and perform църковни задачи. Проблемът на днешното време е, че държавата, тази съвременната просто не е онази, която е изпълнявала църковни задачи. И няма как да стане управникът да финансира църковни йерархии, без това да не бъде санкционирано от данъкоплатеца - т.е. от вярващия, който иска данъците му да отиват там, където е и неговото trust. As recently shown, it is not sufficient in the management of BOC.
why synodal decision hramostroitelstvo in MS is nothing surprising, just once a clear example of the problems today of dogmatiziraneto of canons, following the canonization of dogmatics. And of course their failure. For the head of the Church - the Lord Jesus Christ came not to build temples on ministerial advice ...
M Ministerial hramostroitelna idea is not so old but it is not very new. Her background dates back to early 2010, when reflected in the mass media [1].
Според съобщенията имало два варианта какво да е името на храма в МС - „Св. Борис" или „Свети Иван Рилски". С реализацията бил натоварен adviser to Prime Minister St. S. In addition we learn that as a minister without portfolio, the temple had to be called "St. Boris" because it was pokrastitelyat the nation and was its protector. Others close to the Prime Minister insisted name is "Saint Ivan Rilski" because he was the spiritual patron of the Bulgarians and therefore should be the patron of church government .
One of the main reasons for the prime minister's adviser St. S. to build a temple in MS is that architect who designed the building - Costa Nikolov, have slipped fragments of Rila Monastery . There were parts of the whole ensemble look of the monastery - arches and columns, ceramic tiles, ornaments, stone cladding, arches. They were against the prime minister's office. Furthermore: According wizard St. S., many public buildings had their own churches. [1]
since January waiting for permission, as published in the press, h ashtoto any construction of a chapel, church authorized . According aware Boyko Borisov is possible to ask the patriarch personally consecrated the temple. government would ask the church to help да се пренесат и мощи на светци в параклиса към Министерския съвет. [2]
---------- «»----------
more recently is that there already is not only a question of keeping some religious policy, but with sebeukrasa tsarkovnopodobni scenery and sakralizirano Digging into the subconscious of people with tsarkovnopolezna activity, as almost no other government in Bulgaria so far.
__________________
[1] Cf. S. Vladimirova, Chapel Sv.Boris "build in MS , c. 168 hours - 29.01-04.02.2010, p. 6-7; Cf. also G. Ganev, Znepolski Interview with Bishop John Vicar of Patriarch Maxim: We have not received a request from Prime Minister 168 hours of 29.01-04.02.2010, p. 7.
[2] Ibid.
0 comments:
Post a Comment