Interpretative Decision № 1 Sofia, November 23, 2010
Supreme Court of the Republic Bulgaria General Meeting of the Commercial Division at the hearing of 16.11.2010 years in stock:
CHAIRMAN: Mario Bobatinov
CHAIRS OF SPACES:
Tanya Raykovska
Tanya Raykovska
MEMBERS:
| Lyubka Ilieva | Maria Slavcheva |
| Nicolas Hitrova | Eleonora Chanacheva |
| Rosica Kovacheva | Emil Markov |
| Lydia Ivanova | Kamelia Efremova |
| Vanya Alexieva | Totka Kalcheva |
| Darius Prodanova | Emilia Vassileva |
| Radostina Karakolev | |
the participation of the Secretary Krassimira Atanasova
постави на разглеждане тълкувателно дело № 2 по описа за 2010 год. на ОСТК, докладвано от съдия Дария Проданова
Върховният касационен съд – Търговска College was referred under paragraph 1 item 1 chl.125 vr.chl.124 JSA by the Minister of Justice of the Republic of Bulgaria with a request to rule on the question:
"Do BOC is entering the public register of religion kept in the SCC under Article 18 ZV, and record its local branches, according to Article 20 ZV и пререгистрацията им по §2 ал.4 ЗВ с оглед доказване на тяхната правосубектност и представителна власт?”
Общото събрание на Търговската колегия на Supreme Court to give regard to the following:
The Law on Religious Affairs (WA) of 2002 provided for judicial registration of religious communities as legal persons - Article 15 ZV. Entry in the public register under Article 18 ZV provided both emerging religious communities the acquisition status of legal entity - Art.14 WA, and the faiths that are registered under Article 6 of the repealed Act Religions (IOs), retain their status as legal persons.
In Article 10 paragraph 2 and ZV § 2 paragraph 3 of the TCP of the ZV, expressly excluded the Bulgarian Orthodox Church (BOC) on procedures for registration set out in Chapter III of the Act.
chl.124 Under paragraph 1 JSA adoption of an interpretative decision is conditional upon the existence of improper or controversial practice in law enforcement. Regarding entry into the public register under article 18 of the WA traditional Orthodox religion in Bulgaria, whose mouthpiece is the Bulgarian Orthodox Church, lacking any law. Nowhere in the practice of the courts has not raised the need for listing of BOC in the register under Article 18 or as new WA - WA vr.chl.14 in Article 15 or as welding, within the meaning of § 2 para 1 of the TCP ZV, religion in order to obtain or maintain its status as a legal entity. In the public register of religion, led by Sofia City Court, the Bulgarian Orthodox Church is not recorded and for her lot will open to record the circumstances under Article 18 ZV.
absence of the prerequisites of Paragraph 1 chl.124 JSA on the need to record на Българската православна църква в регистъра на вероизповеданията, който се води от Софийски градски съд съгласно чл.18 ЗВ, искането на Министъра на правосъдието to give an interpretative decision on the merits in this matter should be diverted.
With ZV Article 20 provided an initial order for registration като юридически лица на нововъзникнали местни поделения на вписаните в регистъра по чл.18 ЗВ вероизповедания. Сезирането на съответния окръжен съд е по преценка the central leadership of the denomination, which may, in accordance with its statutes, to ask his local branch to be registered as legal entities. Based on understanding that local units are excluded from the scope of Article 20 ZV, central leadership of the Eastern Orthodox, whose exponent Bulgarian Orthodox Church has not complained to the courts to such claims, and therefore this question does not meet the prerequisites of Paragraph 1 chl.124 JSA and the request Minister of Justice to adjudicate in it should be ignored.
adopted in 1949 Law on Religious Denominations (deleted) does not provide registration law nor religion, nor to their local branches. According to Article 6 IOs (deleted) Religious acquire the quality of legal person from the time of approval of their statutes by the Cabinet or authorized by the Vice-Chairman of the Council of Ministers. Since that time quality of legal entity produce and local branches of religion.
Following the adoption of WA in 2002 incumbent local branches, which are legal entities, subject to registration in register of the district court, maintaining that status under § 2 as introduced by paragraph 4 of the TCP of ZV order.
controversial case is the result to differing interpretations by the courts of the applicability of this order of existing local units of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church. Court regulations containing the controversial interpretation of the law are laid down as the occasion registry proceedings chl.500 CPC (ex) and when checking under Article 25 of CPC (отм.) на правосубектност на страна в исково производство.
Едното от застъпените становища е, че заварените местни поделения на БПЦ, които са ЮЛ, следва да бъдат вписани в регистрите на съответните окръжни съдилища по реда на § 2 ал.4 от ПЗР на ЗВ, тъй като законът не е изключил приложимостта на охранителното производство regarding them as he did this with religion under Article 10 WA - § 2 paragraph 3 of the TFP of ZV.
other taken in case law thesis is that the legacy of ZV local branches of the BOC, which are legal entities should not be entered in the registers of the district courts, as though the law does not explicitly exclude them, to them extends the exemption under paragraph 3 of § 2 of the TCP of the ZV, insofar as divisions of the religion to which this scheme does not apply.
По въпроса за приложимостта на процесуалния ред по § 2 ал.4 от ПЗР на ЗВ е налице противоречива съдебна практика, обуславяща прилагането на чл.124 ал.1 ЗСВ по отношение on it, so that HCV-Commerce college due adjudicate in this matter
General Assembly of the College of Commerce SCC considered properly второто от посочените становища.
Легална дефиниция на понятието „местни поделения” в ЗВ липсва. Такава липсва и в отменения с него ЗИ, който с чл.6 ал.1 predl.2 in conjunction predl.1 only determine the procedure for acquiring legal entity as the local branches of Religions. Statute of the Orthodox Church, established in 1949, is consistent with IOs. This statute does not contain the term "local units". Linking to Article 6 IOs (repealed) contained in Article 13 of the Charter and according to him, "the Bulgarian Patriarchate and its components and offices, and ecclesiastical foundations, institutes, associations and educational institutions that are approved by Sv.Sinod statutes and are under the ultimate direction and supervision of the Church, are legal persons (article 6 of the Law on Religions).
C adopted in 2009 new Statute of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church - Bulgarian Patriarchate (BOC-BP) introduced a definition of "local units". In Article 13 paragraph 1 of the new constitution, as local offices - legal entities referred to Metropolis, churches and monasteries. Conflicting case law on the application of § 2 para 4 ZV preceded the adoption of the Statute of the BOC in 2009, but so far delivery of the courts is cases related to the need for registration and proof of the capacity of churches and monasteries, it does not preclude for the purposes of interpretation in paragraph 1 chl.124 LJ in this case, the court used the definition of local branches established by this Statute, excluding from the scope of other legal entity under rule 13 of the repealed statute. And as mentioned, case law on the application of § 2 paragraph 4 of the TCP of the ZV to them there.
opinion of the SCC-Commerce Association, the local branches of BOC-BP are disallowed under § 2 paragraph 4 of the TCP of the ZV, stems from the following interpretation of the Law Denominations:
Regulated special status of BOC-BP, with Article 10 of Gl.ІІ law is off the traditional religion of Bulgaria from the system of registration of religion established by Chapter III - Article 14-20 ZV. Local units may have the status of legal entity or not, in the first case they are subject на вписване в регистъра на съответния окръжен съд, а във втория – в регистъра на съответната община – чл.19 ЗВ. От обсега на питането са изключени тези местни поделения of BOC-BP, which are not legal persons. The procedure under Article 20 ZV for emerging local offices - legal entity is similar to that provided for in § 2 paragraph 4 of the TCP of the ZV line for existing ones. Consequently, existing legal entities - beliefs and their local branches is applicable scope and the procedural arrangements for entry in the appropriate judicial record as the emerging ones - chl.596-607 CPC. Bulgarian Orthodox Church is exempt from ZV Gl.ІІІ as mentioned above, and is expressly excluded of procedures for re-registration with § 2 paragraph 3 of the TCP of the ZV. The text of § 2 paragraph 4 of the TCP of the ZV makes no distinction as to the order of existing units to which religion regulated. Legal logic suggests that after the Registry mode is off to religion, this scheme does not apply to its local branches. Аргумент в полза на такова тълкуване е и разпоредбата на чл.10 ал.2 предл.2 ЗВ, придаваща нормативна сила на Устава на БПЦ, който определя нейното устройство. Местните поделения – съставни части на БПЦ-БП, и техният правен статут като ЮЛ се определят от чл.13 на Устава - заварения от ЗВ Устав от 1949 год. и сега действащия Устав от 2009 год. The procedural order under § 2 paragraph 4 of TCP predl.3 of WA includes mandatory presentation of a document determined by the entry of religion in the register по чл.18 ЗВ, какъвто БПЦ-БП не може да представи, тъй като не подлежи на вписване в този регистър.
Поради изложените съображения, Общото събрание на Търговска колегия на Върховния касационен съд приема, че процедурата по § 2 ал.4 от ПЗР на ЗВ не се прилага за заварените местни поделения на Българската православна църква - Bulgarian Patriarchate.
ruled on the evidence of legal capacity and power of attorney is conditioned on the determination of previous set by the Minister, issues. Capacity of BOC-BP is the subject of direct settlement by law - Article 10 para 2 predl.1 WA, so it can not be на доказване по реда на чл.27 ГПК. Представителната власт по отношение на БПЦ-БП, също е уредена в закона – чл.10 ал.1 предл.4 ЗВ във вр. чл.30 ал.1 ГПК, като легитимиращ документ е Актът за избор на Българския патриарх – чл.47 ал.4 от Устава на БПЦ-БП.
Местни поделения на Българската православна църква – Българска патриаршия със legal entities are Metropolis, churches and monasteries - 13 of the Statute of the BOC-BP in paragraph 2 vr.chl.10 predl.2 ZV. Their legal representatives under chl.30 paragraph 1 of GPK is legitimate Kato Taki village aktovete selection or hire, issued th bodies, Coit SA selected or appointed: chl.96 par.3 enabled Statute - for mitropoliite: chl.140 paragraph 4 of the Statute - for churches and para 3 chl.161 and paragraph 4 of the Statute - for the monasteries.
On those grounds, the General Assembly of the Commercial Division of the Supreme Court
REPUBLIC AND W:
deviates request of the Minister of Justice to give an interpretative decision on the issue "needs ли е вписване на БПЦ в публичния регистър на вероизповеданията, който се води в СГС, съгласно чл.18 ЗВ, както и вписване на нейни местни поделения, съгласно чл.20 ЗВ?”.
МЕСТНИТЕ ПОДЕЛЕНИЯ на Българската православна църква – Българска патриаршия не подлежат на пререгистрация по реда на §2 ал.4 от ПЗР на ЗВ. Правосубектността The Bulgarian Orthodox Church - Bulgarian Patriarchate and its local branches, which are legal persons resulting from the law - Article 10 para 2 ZV. Representative power of those who represent them is evidenced by acts of selection or appointment issued by the authorities which have elected or appointed.
CHAIRMAN: Mario Bobatinov
CHAIRMEN OF THE BOARDS:
Tanya Raykovska
MEMBERS:
| Lyubka Ilieva |
| Nicolas Hitrova |
| Rosica Kovacheva |
| Lydia Ivanova |
| Vanya Alexieva |
| Darius Prodanova |
| Radostina Karakolev |
| Maria Slavcheva |
| Eleonora Chanacheva |
| Emil Markov |
| Camellia Efremova |
| Totka Kalcheva |
| Emilia Vassileva |
http://www.vks.bg/vks_p10_81 . htm
0 comments:
Post a Comment