Catholic Confirmation Letter To Priest

ЧЕТИРИ КАЗУСА ОКОЛО РЪКОВОДСТВОТО НА БПЦ-БП ОТ НОЕМВРИ 2010 г.

М есец Ноември 2010 г. ще се окаже доста усилен месец за ръководството на БПЦ-БП в юридически и канонически контекст.

На първо place : presumably, first senior cleric was convicted of discrimination . Indeed, in the interest of objectivity, should be told that the Commission for Protection against Discrimination (CPD =) de iure et de facto does not condemn anyone, but a finding of discrimination , because CPD is not a court , although and that decisions are appealed to the Supreme Administrative Court (SAC =). Moreover, the very finding of the CPD, which decided in an ad hoc Appeal Case 110/2009 and left Decision № 259 of 23.11.2010, the (decision will be published on the website after its entry into force, ie, if the 14-day period shall not be appealed before the SAC) has found presence of the discrimination exercised by the senior klirik of BOC-BP, which occupies a very serious position. To no such decision, just that klirik could be excused. Excuse, ie simply to repent, ask forgiveness from other sinners, just like all of us. Because, though the Gospels provide sufficient evidence about how Christ helps maimed. Another issue is whether the supreme klirik ( without higher education ) understood the grace of Christ to not seek victims God among people who have difficulties in movement. Apparently everyone does what is really mind (Romans 13:5), since of course uses it as read Gospels.

CPD decision № 259 of 23.11.2010, will once again put questions to senior management personnel of the BOC-BP, which as shown will not be solved и през 2010 г. Но по Решение КЗД №259 от 23.11.2010 г. ще коментираме, когато то влезе в сила и бъде официално оповестено.

На второ място: С не по-малка сила ноемврийска snowball of cases is set to Oborishte 4 of Vratsa. Finally, the supreme executive power in the BOC-BP is an opportunity that you will hardly benefit, to show that they conform to the canons on church property , whether a bishop is de facto bankrupt before or just trying to justify the allocation of material goods between their mestoblyustiteli . The case is symptomatic and affects all 13 dioceses of the BOC-BP in the territory of Bulgaria. The other two dioceses can not be affected by such casuistry, but that some other time.
canons relating to Vratsa case are so strong , that the synodal decision on this issue instructive property may consist of just a few numbers and letters:

35th canon of Carthaginian council, in conjunction with the 12th canon of VII-I Ecumenical Council, in conjunction with the 15th canon of the council Ankirskiya etc. etc. the interpretation ...;

art. 229th Art. 135th, section 14, art. 121, item 9, and finally чл. 190, т. 6 и т.н. и т.н. от Устава на БПЦ-БП от 2009 г.

Врачанският казус е толкова очеизваден, че просто по-скоро заслужава коментар идващото с неизвестна скорост, ако изобщо някога пристигне, синодално решение с което ще бъдат приложени горните разпоредби спрямо лицата, които не са ги уважили. 

Thirdly , in a not inconsiderable surprise by the Supreme Court, called by himself Interpretative Decision № 1 of 23.11.2010, the General събрание на Търговската колегия - 15 върховни съдии се опитват да тълкуват върху въпрос, поставен им от министъра на правосъдието на РБ относно вписването на БПЦ-БП и нейните местни поделения в регистри - съответно на СГС и на останалите ОС в страната. Странното в случая е, че отклоняват една част от въпроса, по която "нямало" практика , а решават друга, която зависи именно от липсващата практика. " Правната логика ", за която говори ОС на ТК на ВКС в своето решение е онзи litmus test that shows that when 15 judges can not interpret something they just can not write or Copy one or other opinion unless it is linked to mandatory legal framework - erga omnes - ie binding and HCV itself .
If it was not the tragedy of misunderstanding the simplest things, maybe it would be funny.

But general interpretative decision № 1 of 23.11.2010 of the General Assembly of the Commercial Division of the SCC is important, therefore, will be given further consideration.

Fourth but not least should mention an interesting phenomenon in the relationships between Ministers and the Synod of the BOC-BP. Namely otpochvashtoto hramostroitelstvo in the building of Ministers of Bulgaria , which has already been mentioned here . Whatever you say on this matter will not be true and false. Shocking са множество факти, като се започне от самата идея и се достигне до въпросите по УБПЦ-БП, Конституция, Закон за вероизповедания и т.н., доколко синодалното решение on this issue can be argued in some logical and appropriate manner and tsarkovnopraven darzhavnopraven aspect. Hramostroitelstvoto under the nose и под покрива на държавната изпълнителна власт е изключително важен казус, на който също няма начин да не обърнем  по-задълбочено внимание в скоро време. Until then, comments on the matter to remain here .

What Happens If U Dont Treat Genital Herpes?

ХРАМОСТРОИТЕЛСТВО В МИНИСТЕРСКИЯ СЪВЕТ

E two meters you for recent decades, and why не и столетие е имало българско правителство или управляващо мнозинство, което е вложило толкова неистови усилия в своето религиозно декориране и  опити ascension to the scale of religious ritual and ceremony. Distribution of particles from the cross of Christ , opening promotion , Exchange and drift of relics , in country and abroad , incl. photo campaign through relics to attract Russian tourists . Further - религиозно-обвързани рекламни клипове за евроизбори ,  посещения и финансиране на манастирски комплекси  и  манастирско строителство  също documented facts similar situation exists in parliament, where from the outset, 41 th National Assembly has among other things official synodal Representative , even without specific legally established.
only, koeto Kato leaves may be the last pearl crown on Tues pravitelstvoto along religious policies is ustroyavane of own church ministry church .
thus could directly upcoming council in 2012 to be held directly in the building of the Council of Ministers , as has been done thousands of years ago to found and ecumenical councils in imperial palaces of Byzantium. And why not council itself should not be called by the Council of Ministers and Ministers to assist the work of the church council in 2012?

---------- «»----------

In one decisions the Holy Synod of the BOC of 9th November 2010 reads as follows:

+ + +

Having examined the letter of St. Sofia bishopric with attached letter to the Prime Minister of Bulgaria Mr. Boyko Borisov with request to build an Orthodox chapel in honor of St. John of Rila in close proximity to Granite Hall of the Council of Ministers ,

Holy Synod DECIDED:

Gives Blessing to build a chapel of St. John of Rila in the building of the Council of Ministers .

Sofia св. митрополия да бъде консултант по въпросите, свързани с изграждането и установяването на параклиса.

+++

В ъпросите, that arise around this synodal decision are many. Too much can be answered in one or two hundred words . example, whether it is just so simple, only with the synodal decision all in the construction of a chapel within the Council of Ministers? What other issues arise under canon law? And what is the legal (In a purely state-law terms) side of the question?


now directing the reader's attention only to the following provisions of the Charter of BOC: Art. 95, p. 8 UBPTS-BP in connection with art. 140, p. 8 UBPTS-BP ; and also to the provisions of the Constitution : Art. 13, para. 2 and 4 K ; and the Law on Religious - art. 4, Art. 7, para. 2 and especially art. 12 of Law Religious . But there are so many church canons and tenets of state case law , incl. and Decision The Constitutional Court № 2 / 1998 item 16, letter e , sentence. 1st ), which problematize largely hramostroitelstvo synodal decisions already in the building Council of Ministers that their discharge would need very, very ink. At this place we are merely summarize the following conclusion:

Synod of the BOC can not, and may not wish to decide the question by the Prime Minister otherwise. Synod has the above decision and has even expressed an opinion, the promotion of IV-th Church-People's Assembly of 1997 that "BOC to be official church under the Constitution of the Republic of Bulgaria" (Resh. 13 sentence. 4.). This samorazbirat Archpriests the BOC - canonical (in the sense of right) heads of state office - eg. state church.
For management of BOC obviously irrelevant or Basic Law nor any other legislation of the state. Implementation of the church constitution will not importance. Because the church hierarchy - as mere "church tradition" is simply no rule of law as a phenomenon, and there is an absolute monarchy Institute the head of which stood the time "God" vicar on earth, usually, as we know from history themselves in most cases full scoffer. Charters at the medieval time is almost gone. True faith is primarily hierarchical, dressed later in the robe of the Fathers canons to remain nevidoizmenena today. So that everything outside the robe of the hierarchical church authority to be given to eretizam and be prosecuted by the state.
It is clear that after the last ecumenical council kanonotvorcheski Fathers took place about 14 centuries, will be something different from what was then and that observe today.
Regardless of time and space, which is today the institution Synod of the BOC, she sees things only from one angle - symphonic - in time from the sixth century in Byzantium space . If you accidentally do, as recently around the Orthodox world entirely no monarch - Synod institution will see in the face of this or that manager monarch, who is required to withstand financial bishop's hierarchy and perform църковни задачи. Проблемът на днешното време е, че държавата, тази съвременната просто не е онази, която е изпълнявала църковни задачи. И няма как да стане управникът да финансира църковни йерархии, без това да не бъде санкционирано от данъкоплатеца - т.е. от вярващия, който иска данъците му да отиват там, където е и неговото trust. As recently shown, it is not sufficient in the management of BOC.
why synodal decision hramostroitelstvo in MS is nothing surprising, just once a clear example of the problems today of dogmatiziraneto of canons, following the canonization of dogmatics. And of course their failure. For the head of the Church - the Lord Jesus Christ came not to build temples on ministerial advice ...

M Ministerial hramostroitelna idea is not so old but it is not very new. Her background dates back to early 2010, when reflected in the mass media [1]. 
Според съобщенията имало два варианта какво да е името на храма в МС - „Св. Борис" или „Свети Иван Рилски". С реализацията бил натоварен adviser to Prime Minister St. S. In addition we learn that as a minister without portfolio, the temple had to be called "St. Boris" because it was pokrastitelyat the nation and was its protector. Others close to the Prime Minister insisted name is "Saint Ivan Rilski" because he was the spiritual patron of the Bulgarians and therefore should be the patron of church government .

One of the main reasons for the prime minister's adviser St. S. to build a temple in MS is that architect who designed the building - Costa Nikolov, have slipped fragments of Rila Monastery . There were parts of the whole ensemble look of the monastery - arches and columns, ceramic tiles, ornaments, stone cladding, arches. They were against the prime minister's office. Furthermore: According wizard St. S., many public buildings had their own churches. [1]

since January waiting for permission, as published in the press, h ashtoto any construction of a chapel, church authorized . According aware Boyko Borisov is possible to ask the patriarch personally consecrated the temple. government would ask the church to help да се пренесат и мощи на светци в па­раклиса към Министерския съвет.   [2]

Въпреки въпросите, които би следвало да си зададат и МС и Синод на БПЦ, now everything is channeled - a request to the Holy Synod, a decision by the latter and it seems that you only need to fulfill the intention of the Prime Minister: ministers who want to pass an important decision in the government, will soon be able to light candles and pray to St. Ivan Rilski before meeting .

---------- «»----------

In a few words could be concluded that the state political management мнозинство, избрано през юли 2009 г., има своя ясна церемониал-майсторска и църковно-историческа представа , която като тенденция продължава от предишни правителства. 
more recently is that there already is not only a question of keeping some religious policy, but with sebeukrasa tsarkovnopodobni scenery and sakralizirano Digging into the subconscious of people with tsarkovnopolezna activity, as almost no other government in Bulgaria so far.

__________________

[1] Cf. S. Vladimirova, Chapel Sv.Boris "build in MS , c. 168 hours - 29.01-04.02.2010, p. 6-7; Cf. also G. Ganev, Znepolski Interview with Bishop John Vicar of Patriarch Maxim: We have not received a request from Prime Minister 168 hours of 29.01-04.02.2010, p. 7.
[2] Ibid.

How Do You Know If Ap2 Irons Are Authentic?

ТЪЛКУВАТЕЛНО РЕШЕНИЕ №1 от 2010 г. НА ВЪРХОВЕН КАСАЦИОНЕН COURT FOR ENTRY OF THE BULGARIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH IN PUBLIC RECORDS Denominations

Interpretative Decision № 1
Sofia, November 23, 2010

Supreme Court of the Republic Bulgaria General Meeting of the Commercial Division at the hearing of 16.11.2010 years in stock:

CHAIRMAN: Mario Bobatinov

CHAIRS OF SPACES:
Tanya Raykovska

MEMBERS:

Lyubka Ilieva	Maria Slavcheva
Nicolas Hitrova	Eleonora Chanacheva
Rosica Kovacheva	Emil Markov
Lydia Ivanova	Kamelia Efremova
Vanya Alexieva	Totka Kalcheva
Darius Prodanova	Emilia Vassileva
Radostina Karakolev

the participation of the Secretary Krassimira Atanasova

постави на разглеждане тълкувателно дело № 2 по описа за 2010 год. на ОСТК, докладвано от съдия Дария Проданова

Върховният касационен съд – Търговска College was referred under paragraph 1 item 1 chl.125 vr.chl.124 JSA by the Minister of Justice of the Republic of Bulgaria with a request to rule on the question:

"Do BOC is entering the public register of religion kept in the SCC under Article 18 ZV, and record its local branches, according to Article 20 ZV и пререгистрацията им по §2 ал.4 ЗВ с оглед доказване на тяхната правосубектност и представителна власт?”

Общото събрание на Търговската колегия на Supreme Court to give regard to the following:

The Law on Religious Affairs (WA) of 2002 provided for judicial registration of religious communities as legal persons - Article 15 ZV. Entry in the public register under Article 18 ZV provided both emerging religious communities the acquisition status of legal entity - Art.14 WA, and the faiths that are registered under Article 6 of the repealed Act Religions (IOs), retain their status as legal persons.

In Article 10 paragraph 2 and ZV § 2 paragraph 3 of the TCP of the ZV, expressly excluded the Bulgarian Orthodox Church (BOC) on procedures for registration set out in Chapter III of the Act.

chl.124 Under paragraph 1 JSA adoption of an interpretative decision is conditional upon the existence of improper or controversial practice in law enforcement. Regarding entry into the public register under article 18 of the WA traditional Orthodox religion in Bulgaria, whose mouthpiece is the Bulgarian Orthodox Church, lacking any law. Nowhere in the practice of the courts has not raised the need for listing of BOC in the register under Article 18 or as new WA - WA vr.chl.14 in Article 15 or as welding, within the meaning of § 2 para 1 of the TCP ZV, religion in order to obtain or maintain its status as a legal entity. In the public register of religion, led by Sofia City Court, the Bulgarian Orthodox Church is not recorded and for her lot will open to record the circumstances under Article 18 ZV.

absence of the prerequisites of Paragraph 1 chl.124 JSA on the need to record на Българската православна църква в регистъра на вероизповеданията, който се води от Софийски градски съд съгласно чл.18 ЗВ, искането на Министъра на правосъдието to give an interpretative decision on the merits in this matter should be diverted.

With ZV Article 20 provided an initial order for registration като юридически лица на нововъзникнали местни поделения на вписаните в регистъра по чл.18 ЗВ вероизповедания. Сезирането на съответния окръжен съд е по преценка the central leadership of the denomination, which may, in accordance with its statutes, to ask his local branch to be registered as legal entities. Based on understanding that local units are excluded from the scope of Article 20 ZV, central leadership of the Eastern Orthodox, whose exponent Bulgarian Orthodox Church has not complained to the courts to such claims, and therefore this question does not meet the prerequisites of Paragraph 1 chl.124 JSA and the request Minister of Justice to adjudicate in it should be ignored.

adopted in 1949 Law on Religious Denominations (deleted) does not provide registration law nor religion, nor to their local branches. According to Article 6 IOs (deleted) Religious acquire the quality of legal person from the time of approval of their statutes by the Cabinet or authorized by the Vice-Chairman of the Council of Ministers. Since that time quality of legal entity produce and local branches of religion.

Following the adoption of WA in 2002 incumbent local branches, which are legal entities, subject to registration in register of the district court, maintaining that status under § 2 as introduced by paragraph 4 of the TCP of ZV order.

controversial case is the result to differing interpretations by the courts of the applicability of this order of existing local units of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church. Court regulations containing the controversial interpretation of the law are laid down as the occasion registry proceedings chl.500 CPC (ex) and when checking under Article 25 of CPC (отм.) на правосубектност на страна в исково производство.

Едното от застъпените становища е, че заварените местни поделения на БПЦ, които са ЮЛ, следва да бъдат вписани в регистрите на съответните окръжни съдилища по реда на § 2 ал.4 от ПЗР на ЗВ, тъй като законът не е изключил приложимостта на охранителното производство regarding them as he did this with religion under Article 10 WA - § 2 paragraph 3 of the TFP of ZV.

other taken in case law thesis is that the legacy of ZV local branches of the BOC, which are legal entities should not be entered in the registers of the district courts, as though the law does not explicitly exclude them, to them extends the exemption under paragraph 3 of § 2 of the TCP of the ZV, insofar as divisions of the religion to which this scheme does not apply.

По въпроса за приложимостта на процесуалния ред по § 2 ал.4 от ПЗР на ЗВ е налице противоречива съдебна практика, обуславяща прилагането на чл.124 ал.1 ЗСВ по отношение on it, so that HCV-Commerce college due adjudicate in this matter

General Assembly of the College of Commerce SCC considered properly второто от посочените становища.

Легална дефиниция на понятието „местни поделения” в ЗВ липсва. Такава липсва и в отменения с него ЗИ, който с чл.6 ал.1 predl.2 in conjunction predl.1 only determine the procedure for acquiring legal entity as the local branches of Religions. Statute of the Orthodox Church, established in 1949, is consistent with IOs. This statute does not contain the term "local units". Linking to Article 6 IOs (repealed) contained in Article 13 of the Charter and according to him, "the Bulgarian Patriarchate and its components and offices, and ecclesiastical foundations, institutes, associations and educational institutions that are approved by Sv.Sinod statutes and are under the ultimate direction and supervision of the Church, are legal persons (article 6 of the Law on Religions).

C adopted in 2009 new Statute of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church - Bulgarian Patriarchate (BOC-BP) introduced a definition of "local units". In Article 13 paragraph 1 of the new constitution, as local offices - legal entities referred to Metropolis, churches and monasteries. Conflicting case law on the application of § 2 para 4 ZV preceded the adoption of the Statute of the BOC in 2009, but so far delivery of the courts is cases related to the need for registration and proof of the capacity of churches and monasteries, it does not preclude for the purposes of interpretation in paragraph 1 chl.124 LJ in this case, the court used the definition of local branches established by this Statute, excluding from the scope of other legal entity under rule 13 of the repealed statute. And as mentioned, case law on the application of § 2 paragraph 4 of the TCP of the ZV to them there.

opinion of the SCC-Commerce Association, the local branches of BOC-BP are disallowed under § 2 paragraph 4 of the TCP of the ZV, stems from the following interpretation of the Law Denominations:

Regulated special status of BOC-BP, with Article 10 of Gl.ІІ law is off the traditional religion of Bulgaria from the system of registration of religion established by Chapter III - Article 14-20 ZV. Local units may have the status of legal entity or not, in the first case they are subject на вписване в регистъра на съответния окръжен съд, а във втория – в регистъра на съответната община – чл.19 ЗВ. От обсега на питането са изключени тези местни поделения of BOC-BP, which are not legal persons. The procedure under Article 20 ZV for emerging local offices - legal entity is similar to that provided for in § 2 paragraph 4 of the TCP of the ZV line for existing ones. Consequently, existing legal entities - beliefs and their local branches is applicable scope and the procedural arrangements for entry in the appropriate judicial record as the emerging ones - chl.596-607 CPC. Bulgarian Orthodox Church is exempt from ZV Gl.ІІІ as mentioned above, and is expressly excluded of procedures for re-registration with § 2 paragraph 3 of the TCP of the ZV. The text of § 2 paragraph 4 of the TCP of the ZV makes no distinction as to the order of existing units to which religion regulated. Legal logic suggests that after the Registry mode is off to religion, this scheme does not apply to its local branches. Аргумент в полза на такова тълкуване е и разпоредбата на чл.10 ал.2 предл.2 ЗВ, придаваща нормативна сила на Устава на БПЦ, който определя нейното устройство. Местните поделения – съставни части на БПЦ-БП, и техният правен статут като ЮЛ се определят от чл.13 на Устава - заварения от ЗВ Устав от 1949 год. и сега действащия Устав от 2009 год. The procedural order under § 2 paragraph 4 of TCP predl.3 of WA includes mandatory presentation of a document determined by the entry of religion in the register по чл.18 ЗВ, какъвто БПЦ-БП не може да представи, тъй като не подлежи на вписване в този регистър.

Поради изложените съображения, Общото събрание на Търговска колегия на Върховния касационен съд приема, че процедурата по § 2 ал.4 от ПЗР на ЗВ не се прилага за заварените местни поделения на Българската православна църква - Bulgarian Patriarchate.

ruled on the evidence of legal capacity and power of attorney is conditioned on the determination of previous set by the Minister, issues. Capacity of BOC-BP is the subject of direct settlement by law - Article 10 para 2 predl.1 WA, so it can not be на доказване по реда на чл.27 ГПК. Представителната власт по отношение на БПЦ-БП, също е уредена в закона – чл.10 ал.1 предл.4 ЗВ във вр. чл.30 ал.1 ГПК, като легитимиращ документ е Актът за избор на Българския патриарх – чл.47 ал.4 от Устава на БПЦ-БП.

Местни поделения на Българската православна църква – Българска патриаршия със legal entities are Metropolis, churches and monasteries - 13 of the Statute of the BOC-BP in paragraph 2 vr.chl.10 predl.2 ZV. Their legal representatives under chl.30 paragraph 1 of GPK is legitimate Kato Taki village aktovete selection or hire, issued th bodies, Coit SA selected or appointed: chl.96 par.3 enabled Statute - for mitropoliite: chl.140 paragraph 4 of the Statute - for churches and para 3 chl.161 and paragraph 4 of the Statute - for the monasteries.

On those grounds, the General Assembly of the Commercial Division of the Supreme Court

REPUBLIC AND W:

deviates request of the Minister of Justice to give an interpretative decision on the issue "needs ли е вписване на БПЦ в публичния регистър на вероизповеданията, който се води в СГС, съгласно чл.18 ЗВ, както и вписване на нейни местни поделения, съгласно чл.20 ЗВ?”.

МЕСТНИТЕ ПОДЕЛЕНИЯ на Българската православна църква – Българска патриаршия не подлежат на пререгистрация по реда на §2 ал.4 от ПЗР на ЗВ. Правосубектността The Bulgarian Orthodox Church - Bulgarian Patriarchate and its local branches, which are legal persons resulting from the law - Article 10 para 2 ZV. Representative power of those who represent them is evidenced by acts of selection or appointment issued by the authorities which have elected or appointed.

CHAIRMAN: Mario Bobatinov

CHAIRMEN OF THE BOARDS:

Tanya Raykovska

MEMBERS:

Lyubka Ilieva

Nicolas Hitrova

Rosica Kovacheva

Lydia Ivanova

Vanya Alexieva

Darius Prodanova

Radostina Karakolev

Maria Slavcheva

Eleonora Chanacheva

Emil Markov

Camellia Efremova

Totka Kalcheva

Emilia Vassileva

http://www.vks.bg/vks_p10_81 . htm

Retaining Wall Estimates Online

QUESTIONS ABOUT PENSIONS priests from the end of XIX-th и НАЧАЛОТО НА XX-ти век

In aprosi, legal and legislative pensions around the Bulgarian priests are nothing new. New appearing on the agenda is that it is clear how in Bulgaria candidates for priests in the system of BOC slow but very lasting decrease. To some extent the reason for this and is supporting them. Issues around the provision of support they occupied the church and state legislation in the late XIX-th and the beginning of the XX-th century. One very curious on the subject material is magazines Hristo Vargov in his book "Constitution of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church. History and development Bishopric of statutes, S. 1920. The Red Thread, which is clearly visible across the below quoted text shows that the church leadership - in the face of the Bishopric синод тогава се е стремял да извземе прерогативите за пенсионните осигуровки на свещениците от държавата. Т.е. свещеническите пенсии да не се администрират by the State and of Synod. The unique thing is that here, rather it is a synodal opportunities not take care to provide better pensions, but rather limited to a "more open-minded" priests and their heirs. While the sight of today's contemporary (XXI-st century) is difficult to understand how, if the BOC is then de iure et de facto държавна църква, управлението и прави завой в обратната посока. Парадоксът в днешно време е именно в контроверза, че БПЦ не е държавна църква, но ръководството and moves in the opposite rails.

below quoted text is extremely important because it carries the reader through time almost always spoke with great tenderness by the senior clergy of the BOC. An objective reading, however, testifies to something else. That time was in fact no less problematic today than anything else it is gone and not coming back, but problems remain on the agenda and looking for its adequate solution.

---------- «»----------

Vargova Christo, the Constitution of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church. History and development of the Bishopric ustava, S., State Printing, 1920, p. 271-274.

[ spelling has been preserved as quoted text. ]

We in gorѣ said that the Holy Sinoda bila tvardѣ nedovolena for dѣto not gospodary of pensiitѣ of sacred-sluzhitelitѣ . Already in prison and thy duhovena sana otllchchvane of Rev. Semenova , Plovdiv eparhialena duhovena savѣta postanovila to deprive thy retirement and be punished according to stipulations of penalties. torah. St. Sinoda othvarlila dvѣ these points but the first makes a reservation, which is hard ѣ interesting. St. Sinoda would imala nothing protiva if such a monster - HUMAN ѣ BREASTFEEDING, as he cm ѣ tala Rev. Semenova, deprive thy pension, but b ѣ date was unto do, in that the masters of pensiit ѣ with ѫ grazhdanskit ѣ authorities . Therefore it is necessary pensiit ѣ to minata floor in ѣ domstvoto the Synod and then he will start to apply the law fully toward freedom, and slovohotlivi eretichestvuyushti priests. This great e ѣ lo St. Sinoda out etc ѣ teeth Peak ѣ me of Popular Liberal government and it unto momenta, where the atmosphere b ѣ cg ѫ Wall - knyazata b ѣ osvirkana, had a strike and "anarchism" b ѣ unto its height and quarter ѣ bvashe to syzdavata zakonopolozheniya Wed ѣ shtu "razrushitelnit ѣ "items. Not in vain" in N. ѣ BREASTFEEDING "unto in 1906 said that the priesthood quarter ѣ bva to prepare for combat Wed ѣ щu "razrushitelnit ѣ "ideas ...

unto this commotion Holy Sinoda, hath criticism etc ѣ w ѣ nka unto H ародното събрание, стана господарь на свещеническит ѣ пенсии.  

При tabling of the bill E. Petkova take word and says:

" Lord, for this zakonoproekta enoriyskit ѣ izrabotena thy priests is St. Sinoda and co consent shall be paid unto H Arod Assembly. Pensiit ѣ of enoriyskit ѣ sacred officers to CTD ѣ лятъ и ще се даватъ за напр ѣ дъ отъ Светия Синодъ. Фондътъ, за който се говори, ще б ѫ де образуванъ отъ одръжкит ѣ на свещеницит ѣ и др. н ѣ which sources, because that unto the State case Mr ѣ persons to give Mr and z o, so I will please accept the Bill and BC ѣ sent unto the Committee ".

Pr ѣ dlozhenieto of ministra-BC ѣ dsedatelya be put to the vote and adopted. Sl ѣ Te Tuy bill introduced into the second and third reading and adopted hath debates * .

unto this torah according chlena 23 pensionerata lost п раво или се лишава отъ пенсия: 

а) когато извърши пр ѣ stzhplenie and b ѫ Dec. axis ѫ dena for T ѣ huh thy duhovnit ѣ and citizens with ѫ Dili;

b) otst ѫ pnichestvo thy Orthodox izpov ѣ YES to tolerance in thy ѣ domstvot o the Bulgarian church to amend ѣ of a Fatherland or prince;

в) за злоупотр ѣ бление на църковни имоти или пари, за кражба, мошеничество и въобще за пр ѣ Senior ѫ captivity, which vlechata tamnichena zatvora co withdrawal grazhdanskit ѣ and politicheskit ѣ права; 

г) когато лицето, за да получи пенсия, пр ѣ дстави лъжливъ dokumenta when enoriyskiyata sveshtenosluzhitely deprive thy duhovena sana. In this article. St. Sinoda is postavila et seq ѣ dnyata Note ѣ л ѣ жка: „За случаит ѣ , означени въ пр ѣ dshetstvuyushtit ѣ points Y ^ point a, b and c are lish avata thy right pension and naslѣdnitsitѣ such priests ".

And for thy otstpnichestvo Orthodox izpovѣdanie nizverzhenie and thy spiritual sana are deprive thy pension не само виновника, но и наслѣдницитѣ му. Ние по-горѣ видѣхме какъ се разбира отъ епархиалнитѣ с ѫ дилища и Св. Синодъ, „православното izpovѣdanie " and kaka slightly lishavata thy duhovena sana priests to razberema tragedy of waking priesthood, which for the most innocent and misaly ѫ zhdenie may fall Y ^ chlena top and left naked, barefoot and hungry on the street . This puts chlena chains of priesthood misaly and savѣsty vsѣka religious and scared and aware soul thy priesthood sana, so tvardѣ umѣstno bѣ razkritikuvana unto press ** .

law unto pensiitѣ vrѣmennitѣ and aid thy sveshtenitsitѣ 1889 Art. 12 votes:

"Use thy pension prѣstava:

a) where a priest or diakonata b ѫ Dec. axis ѫ dena for prѣstzhplenie, punishable co zatvora thy three years nagorѣ;

b) where the priest or diakona lishata be thy candle. sana;

c) where widow or ostanalitѣ dѣtsa the late priest or diakona be manifest unto obvinyata beznravstvenosty and vinovnostyta unto prove ".

unto "Rules scapegoat pensions and benefits to vrѣmenni sveshtenitsitѣ" thy 29 Marton 18 1990 Art. 11 states:

"right to use thy pension prѣstava:

"1) when the priest or diak o nata b ѫ Dec. axis ѫ dena for prѣstzhpleniya punishable co zatvora thy nagorѣ three years (art. 12, para. oty a law);

2) when the priest or diakonata lishata be thy priest sana (Art. 13 para . 2 thy law) and

3) where is naslѣdnitsitѣ obvinyata unto beznravstvenosty and prove (Art. 12 para. c. thy law). These decrees nagleda with ѫ сурови, но се пакъ свещеникъть е застрахованъ за своето честно, обективно и научно religious view. Pension is taken when b ѫ Dec. axis ѫ dena three years and deprivation zatvora thy duhovena sana.

We vidѣhme that Rev. Semenova is bila lishena thy duhovena sana, but not axis ѫ dena thy grazhdanskitѣ with ѫ Dili as iskala Plovdiv divski eparh. savѣta. When he bila uchitely. But it is not bila uchitely, grazhdanskitѣ authorities shtѣha him otpusnata pension. St. Sinoda, sazrѣla this inadequacy unto axis ѫ zhdaneto to "provinenitѣ" and the right bevel, but ѫ izmѣna society, namely: duhovnoto face lost pension where b ѫ December OSJD and out with duhovnitѣ ѫ Dili for otst ѫ пничество отъ православното изповѣдание ( разбирано отъ четирма свещеници или владици б. н. ), за отклонение отъ българската църква(?) . . . Ония, which otst ѫ pyata thy "Orthodox izpovѣdanie and lishata thy duhovena sana, stavata vrѣdni and naslѣdnitsitѣ that mogata to b ѫ data "prѣpravoslavni" even unto the spirit of epar. with ѫ Te, sinoda etc., but tѣ will lishata thy pension to kalnata and unto his grave roditely "eretika" .

St. Sinoda not find words to nahvali nation- liberal Government co adoption of the law pensiitѣ. "Today's government, says vy" W. century "(number 5 and 6) perform dalga of righteousness unto parish priesthood in the Kingdom. In the personal intercession of St. prѣdsedatelstvuyushtiya Sinoda † Konstantina, it agreed to submit unto convene an extraordinary session of the H Arod With abranie and to push, ch minor promѣni, worked out and thy Holy Sinoda ostanala nerazgledana unto regular session poslѣdnoto zakonoproekta for pensiitѣ enoriyskitѣ of priests.

" This day the bill is torah. Church expresses a blagodarnosty the government about it. Special blagodarnosty and priznatelnosty she tragically died due to ministara E. Petkova and ministers izpovѣdaniyata E. Stanchova ... That their co Government act to put an mnѣnie belies the church and clergy darzhata poslѣdno mѣsto grizhitѣ unto the State "...

__________________

*   Ср. Дневници на XIII о. н. с. стр. 66, 67,.;110, 114 и 116.  

** Ср. критиката въ „Дух. Пр." 1907 г. и отговора на синодалния органъ (C, newspaper st. 12 and 13, 1907) c. "Bell" (number 14. 95, 1911).