In eche to mention , that labor law of the church is its specific legal area. With many layers, with very diverse and often contradictory regulations, because the latter actually са микстури от държавно-църковно законодателство , което - дебело трябва да се подчертае - по принцип се спазва избирателно от страна църковното ръководство . The fact that the priests - the elders of the church - are always between hammer and anvil to know better. They are often criticized by the church people that do not meet proper duties, while senior clergy expects them to outsource the entire burden of spreading the gospel of Christ and spiritual care of vatsarkovenite, mostly by selling candles.
In a sufficiently serious sound and highly critical text: who sows iniquity will reap unions have spoken many truths. Truths so that pain is really great. But the truth liberates. Although only one who wants to release.
Almost everything about the analysis of iniquities and trade unions is limited to so-called. OPINION of the Holy Synod of the Orthodox Church on the occasion have arisen in funds the media reports of a "priests union" .
Because synodal articulate on blue (o) in dikalnost BOC labor law is important, spend a little time for his analysis, even in this place do another stipulation that criticism, which in някого би се сторила прекалена е само израз на една голяма болка и загриженост на всички църковни членове - невъзможността за изглаждане на напрежението между различни представители на личния състав на клира на БПЦ по един по-цивилизован и безпроблемен начин, именно по християнски - братолюбиво.
Because synodal articulate on blue (o) in dikalnost BOC labor law is important, spend a little time for his analysis, even in this place do another stipulation that criticism, which in някого би се сторила прекалена е само израз на една голяма болка и загриженост на всички църковни членове - невъзможността за изглаждане на напрежението между различни представители на личния състав на клира на БПЦ по един по-цивилизован и безпроблемен начин, именно по християнски - братолюбиво.
In synodal statement said:
Holy Synod of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church to respect the rights of Bulgarian citizens and human rights , guaranteed by the Constitution of the Bulgarian state and international treaties to which Bulgaria is a party, including and the right of association of employees in trade unions and unions under constitutional rule of Art. 49, and the right to strike under чл. 50, които са в Глава Втора на основния закон - „Основни права и задължения на гражданите”.
Всъщност, ако Светият Синод на Българската православна Church must respect the rights of Bulgarian citizens and human rights, his opinion is pointless. Just because hardly anyone would deny that the priest is a man and he was making the same human rights that the Holy Synod of the Orthodox Church respects . Synodal member is also a man. Arguments for limiting човешки права поради религиозни съображения е много спорен момент, особено, ако не почива на свободна съвест. Разпоредбата на чл. 7, ал. 4 от Закона за вероизповеданията обаче е категоричен, че "Правата и свободите на лицата, членуващи в религиозна общност, не могат да бъдат ограничавани от вътрешните правила, ритуали и обреди of this community or institution. "
However, this is the projection of art. 58, para. 2 of the Constitution which says that" religious or other convictions are not ground for refusal to perform the duties established by the Constitution and laws. " And this case study could be considered closed.
Но становището продължава.
Но същевременно Светият Синод държи да припомни на българската общественост, че според член 13, ал. 2 от Конституцията religious communities are separate from the state , but according to Art. 13, para. 4 of the Constitution that religious communities and institutions, and religious beliefs can not be used for political purposes . Significantly, the constitutional legislator has used the most general terms: "political purposes" rather than conduct на политическа дейност, присъща на политически партии, каквато е забраната на чл. 12, ал. 2 от Конституцията относно сдруженията на гражданите, включително и синдикалните. ban on the use of religious communities for political purposes shall apply to trade unions, because in general their objectives most often in the best sense are political. be seen in otherwise express provision of Art. 13 of the Constitution is a wrong interpretation of the Constitution and abuse by law.Holy Synod, however, forget what he says Decision 13 ABI. 4 IV CNS - Orthodox religion in Bulgaria to receive a formal constitutional status denomination of the Bulgarian state. A very synodal interpretation of constitutional provisions 13, para. 4 and 12, para. 2 is really wrong at all interesting logic. Holy Synod said that the union organizitsii are most often in a good sense of the term political goals. However, according to the Constitution is not true because чл. 12, ал. 2 предписва, че сдруженията на гражданите, включително синдикалните, не могат да си поставят политически цели и да извършват политическа дейност, присъщи of the political parties. The same goes for religious communities and institutions of art. 13, para. 4. Ie in general and the BOC and the unions are not used for political цели и не извършват политически дейности, защото и двете не са политически партии. И това е съвсем ясно. Оказва се обаче, че синдикатите стоят по-близо до религиозните communities, rather than political parties. Argument that clearly benefit from trade union founders. Wrong interpretation of art. 13 of the Constitution and abuse the right would occur in cases where clergy participate in partisan campaigns. But as we already saw in Art. 12, paragraph 2, union associations can not put policy objectives and carry out political activities that are characteristic of the political parties, ie there would be no danger unions to involve clergy in political activities and goals, because the latter are prohibited .
Furthermore, the Holy Synod wishes to emphasize that the priests and people with spiritual titles are not employees under general employment law and legal relationship that arises between the patriarch, bishops and priests is not commonly used in occupational sense, because it is based on the act with sacred content - ordination, and therefore people with spiritual titles serve life. Therefore, this relationship - origin, content and termination is not subject to secular controls, including judicial, because ordination the ministry is to God, but not formally perform works for an employer. Founded in Art. 29 of Law Religious told , that the rights and duties of priests and employees of religious institutions are governed first by their charters, and only when no special regulations applicable labor and social legislation and it is more a social and health insurance obligations as Bulgarian Orthodox Church tries to carry the state.It is true that priests and people with titles are spiritual ministry, ministry of God. And the relationship that occurs between the patriarch, bishops and priests is not commonly used in occupational sense, a church official and church employment. Eg. чл. 227 УБПЦ признава правата на църковните служители (миряни) по Кодекса на труда и други разпоредби на трудовото и осигурителното законодателство, а по чл. 225 УБПЦ регламентира, че свещенослужители, получаващи възнаграждение (явно има и такива без възнаграждение) ще подлежат на осигуряване по светското законодателство. And Art. 29 of the Denominations Act simply lists without set conditions, if there are no regulations in the statute, then a state law. Moreover, УБПЦ е просто подзаконов нормативен акт и ако противоречи на държавно законодателство, би могло и дори следвало изобщо да не се прилага.
Напомняме, that priests and bishops of the Orthodox churches, primarily perform canonical provisions and statutes BOC is the charter with row which in Art. 139, par. 1 of clerics and monashestvashti forbidden to hold positions and make commitments in state and local authorities to participate in party activities и предизборна кампания, както и да се кандидатират за органи на европейско, държавно и местно ниво , а според ал. 2 на клирици и монашестващи е забранено да имат behavior incompatible with their dignity and undermine the authority of the Church. According to Art. 135, par. 1, item 20 of the Statute of the Orthodox Church parish priest is obliged to perform precise conscientiously and diligently their duties of office and rank determined by church rules and the Charter and in violation of its obligations to respond accordingly Church-disciplinary and ecclesiastical courts.
now become sufficiently clear that Mr. a union is prohibited from political activity and political objectives , so any concerns on UBPTS 139 incl. and 135 UBPTS are simply unfounded. Trade unions do not emit any MPs or MEPs. Implementation of службата добросъвестно не може да зависи от членство на свещенослужител в професионална организация.
Освен това, в Устава на БПЦ-БП има специална Part Four - Special rules on the legal status of employees in the Bulgarian Orthodox Church - Bulgarian Patriarchate, which is regulated in detail specific legal status of priests , which is significantly different from that of employees in total employment law. For BOC and its people with the spiritual title of corrective behavior are mostly Holy Scriptures and canons of the Orthodox Church, which should be respected и от държавата и обществените неправителствени организации. По този начин се зачита и защитава правото на вероизповедание по чл. 9 от Европейската конвенция human rights and fundamental freedoms as the right means first and foremost respect the autonomous right of churches. right of the church is a matter institutional sovereignty of the Church, which together with state sovereignty is part of the legal space .As is clear from the media, clergymen се организират в синдикат именно поради неуредиците в УБПЦ - особени правила. Поради споменатия чл. 9 ЕКЗПЧОС, който е в много по-голяма степен защитна разпоредба the individual, ie priest than a guarantee of sovereignty church bordering sometimes arbitrary . According to the Decision of the Constitutional Court 2 / 1998 D. (item 16 e) is a secular state. Therefore, the sources of ecclesiastical law is therefore irrelevant to the state and church law does not oblige the state. Institutional sovereignty of the Church is simply dependent on state sovereignty, because the history is clear that with the loss of the Bulgarian state, BOC cease to exist institutionally.
Based on Holy Scripture, Holy Tradition, Rules of the Holy Apostles, the holy canons of the Ecumenical and Place councils, the doctrine of the Fathers and the Statute of BOC remind priests, that have made a voluntary request for ordination, having previously signed the declaration that they respect the canons and the Statute of BOC .
In none of the sources of ecclesiastical law: Holy Scripture, Holy Tradition, Rules of the Holy Apostles, Sacred canons of the Ecumenical Councils and displayed, the doctrine of the Fathers and the Statute of the Orthodox Church there is no explicit mention of non-participation of priests professional or trade organizations. Firstly, because at the time of the last-accepted canons similar phenomenon was unknown, second namely by signing a voluntary application for ordination canons and priests observe UBPTS because they do not break them, precisely because there is no prohibition to participate in the syndicate.
Membership of the clergy in the union is against the spirit of the Canon and the Statute of the BOC.
priest follows:
"To submit a remedy within the church their area. "(Kart. 25 125 Wed II, 6 IV. 9) (Diocesan Bishop, Diocesan Council, the spiritual consistory, church conferences).
"Not should ask the king (the secular authority) of secular judges. "(Kart. 104)
Holy Synod granted free opinion and freedom of association for all individuals, but in the Church there are rules for ordination whose members voluntarily and knowingly have vowed to carry and this pledge is to God!
And because there is no prohibition to participate in the syndicate, the Holy Synod said last that he still - against the spirit of the Canon and the Statute of the BOC. Subject to the provisions of Carthaginian canons - 25, 104 and 125, and II. 6; IV. 9, remains to be pointed out that depriving citizens of the state litigation, incl. and labor disputes is a violation of state law защото това е основно международно и конституционно право на всеки човек. Проблематичното в случая е, че всеки клирик и член на църквата е и гражданин на държавата and regulations of the latter relate to the church community, while the opposite is not true in general. Among other things, if those Carthaginian canons are recognized as existing, should be repealed provisions 95, t.17, 154, item 12, 171, item 23, 176, p. 5, 220 UBPTS because these contradict them. The last argument the Holy Synod, that it respects freedom of opinion and freedom of association for all individuals, but the Church has rules, obviously talking about the fact that actually part by senior clergy respects the rights of the individual, but alas not everyone in church is an individual or someone who enjoys their human rights. That is the most problematic момент в цялото църковно право. Че ако Бог сам даде свобода на човека, Христос бе разпнат, за да освободи човека от греха и фарисейските постановки, а човешки representatives of the church trying to look for rules that restrict individual liberty, are they not part of this past senior clerics those themselves working against God and Lord?
In conclusion, it should be noted that all raising the question of union participation of priests is less важен, отколкото всички онези принципни христологични въпроси, витаещи в пространството между държава и църква и търсещи отчаяно и болезнено отговори за своето разрешаване. В настоящия текст ясно може да се проследи проблематичността и спорните моменти, най-вече поради дефицита на възможности да се приложи canon exist on social phenomenon, also exist at the time of fairs. Open questions remain for each reader.
0 comments:
Post a Comment