Напоследък все по-ясно се вижда, че България се превръща в една от държавите, срещу които съдът в Страсбург е издал най-много sentences for human rights abuse after Turkey and Russia. Thus confirmed as one of the states paying the most benefits violated human rights. Last in last year as paid 1.778 million in over 150 cases. The huge amount of compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as and costs in the process of applicants. Since 1992 Bulgaria has paid a total of over 5 million in damages in cases in Strasbourg, despite the lack of formal обобщена статистика.
Списък на делата, по които България е осъдена поради нарушаване на основото право на религиозна свобода може да се разгледа here .
Boychev case and others. against Bulgaria in the French original can be read here . With this conviction include the Bulgarian state recurrences among its eighth case of a similar nature.
Brief annotation:
On January 27, 2011 the court held its decision in case "Boychev and Others v. Bulgaria", which refers to the case concerning the invasion of 6 April 1997 by several police officers at the home of one by the applicants in Blagoevgrad during collection of religion followers of the so-called "reverend" Moon. At that time, this religious community is unregistered in Bulgaria, which circumstance, according to modern standards of human rights is not important. Gatherings on the occasion of liturgical and ritual action in non-public места не подлежат на ригистрационни предпоставки. По време на нахлуването полицията иззела голямо количество книги, документи и видеоматериали. Според прокуратурата, която е разрешила нахлуването, жалбоподателите е следвало да бъдат предпазени от извършване на "тежко престъпление".
ЕСПЧ постановява, че action of the police is totally devoid of legal basis, since the legal framework that regulate them, is too vague and gives the police broad opportunities up to arbitrariness.
court once again stated that the law in Bulgaria does not create clarity due to the possibility - unregistered religious communities to pursue undisturbed meetings and administrative law is often interpreted as such gatherings illegal.
For these reasons it is not surprising that the ECHR is in this case a violation of Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
0 comments:
Post a Comment